Cases 11 - 20 of 801
Spurlin v. United States Probation Office
as 6:2023cv06109
Petitioner:
Jacob Russell Spurlin and John Ray Monroe
Respondent:
United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Newberry v. Wetchel et al
as 4:2023cv00479
Petitioner:
John S. Newberry
Respondent:
Captain Wetchel, Pottawattamie County Jail and Wetchel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. Larson et al
as 4:2023cv00480
Petitioner:
John S. Newberry
Respondent:
Jeffery L. Larson, Captain Wenchel and Wenchel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wardell v. Westman
as 4:2023cv03200
Petitioner:
Wendel Robert Wardell
Respondent:
John Westman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Solberg v. Eischen et al
as 0:2023cv03589
Petitioner:
John M. Solberg
Respondent:
B. Eischen, J. Kozulla, S. Hachey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Red Cloud v. Santana
as 5:2023cv05079
Petitioner:
Henry John Red Cloud, Jr.
Respondent:
Agent Taylor Santana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Newberry v. Larson et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
John S Newberry
Respondent:
Jeffery L Larson and Captain Wenchel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newberry v. Wetchel et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Petitioner:
John S Newberry
Respondent:
Captain Wetchel and Pottawattamie County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Pieper, Jr. v. Rob Jeffreys
as 23-3462
Petitioner / Appellant:
John W. Pieper, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Rob Jeffreys
Comstock v. Vandergriff
as 6:2023cv03332
Petitioner:
John Comstock
Respondent:
Teri Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
