Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Demos v. Holbrook
as 4:2019cv00818
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Donald Holbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense
as 8:2013cv00012
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Obama et al
as 4:2013cv00050
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Barack Obama, United States Secretary of State, United States Secretary of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. U.S. Secretary of Defense et al
as 4:2012cv04219
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
U.S. Secretary of Defense, The U.S. Secretary of State, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. USA
as 4:2012cv00802
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
John Robert Demos, Jr. v. Patrick Glebe
as 10-1952
Petitioner - Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Patrick Glebe, Attorney General of the State of Washington
John Robert Demos, Jr. v. Patrick Glebe
as 10-1777
Petitioner - Appellant:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Patrick Glebe
Demos v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv04022
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Glebe
as 4:2010cv04016
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr.
Respondent:
Pat Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Glebe
as 1:2010cv00013
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Patrick Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
