Cases 61 - 70 of 303
Siruk et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2020cv02385
Defendant:
City of Elk River, State of Minnesota and Sherburne County
Plaintiff:
Marina Siruk and Petro Siruk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Siruk et al v. State of Minnesota (City of Elk River) et al
as 0:2020cv02373
Defendant:
Chad Hennum, Eric Holmquist, Nabil Gubash and others
Plaintiff:
Petro Siruk and Marina Siruk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jarvis v. Rapid City, Pierre, & Eastern Railroad Inc.
as 3:2020cv03020
Defendant:
Rapid City, Pierre, & Eastern Railroad Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cheree L. Jarvis
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Popson
as 4:2020cv00897
Defendant:
Tomas Caesar Popson
Plaintiff:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Popson
as 4:2020cv00898
Defendant:
Tomas Caesar Popson
Plaintiff:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Kansas City, Missouri v. Popson
as 4:2020cv00899
Defendant:
Tomas Caesar Popson
Plaintiff:
City of Kansas City, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Petrovich v. City of Duluth, MN et al
as 0:2020cv02272
Defendant:
Saint Louis County, MN and City of Duluth, MN
Plaintiff:
Bryce Joseph Petrovich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Cambrex Charles City, Inc
as 6:2020cv02083
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Cambrex Charles City, Inc. and Cambrex Charles City, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jensen et al v. Taylor Company et al
as 4:2020cv03113
Defendant:
Taylor Company, Middleby Corporation, RSM Acquisition, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jensen and David Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huling et al v. City of Sioux Falls
as 4:2020cv04134
Plaintiff:
Karen Huling and Christopher Huling
Defendant:
City of Sioux Falls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
