Cases 11 - 20 of 595
McDannell v. City of Gladstone et al
as 4:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Christopher M McDannell
Defendant:
City of Gladstone, Jean Moore, Gladstone Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tayvin Galanakis v. City of Newton, Iowa, et al
as 24-1275
Plaintiff:
Tayvin Galanakis
Defendant:
City of Newton, Iowa, Rob Burdess, Nathan Winters and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, et al v. Judy Henry, et al
as 24-1071
Plaintiff:
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, Luther Oneal Sutter and Lucien R. Gillham
Defendant:
Judy Simmons Henry, Jacob Post Fair, Scott A. Irby and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
