Cases 11 - 20 of 507
Matthews v. Beuter et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jerry Ray Matthews
Defendant:
Dave Beuter, Michelle Reese, Jerry A Vander Sanden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Matthew Locke v. County of Hubbard, et al
as 24-1285
Plaintiff:
Matthew Locke
Defendant:
County of Hubbard, Cory Aukes, in his official and individual capacity and Scott Parks, in his official and individual capacity
Elburki v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2024cv03039
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Ken McClure, City Clerk Anita Cotter and others
Claimant:
Mr. Kamel M. Elburki
Plaintiff:
Kamel M. Elburki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alvarado v. Moore et al
as 0:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Juan Alvarado
Defendant:
Isaiah Moore, Matthew McNeely, Joseph LeFevere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan Brainerd v. Chad Ward, et al
as 24-1152
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Lt. Ontravarious, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Chief Clerk and all Clerks Involved from Miller County, AR and others
Zika v. Calvert et al
as 4:2023cv03249
Plaintiff:
Garry Zika
Defendant:
Christopher Calvert and Matthew Holcomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matthew Jones v. Arkansas Highway Police
as 23-3718
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas Highway Police
Jones v. Steele Police
as 1:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
Steele Police
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
