Cases 11 - 20 of 190
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Ball et al v. Nilsson et al
as 0:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jeannie F. Ball, Jennifer J. Ball, Jeannie Ball and others
Defendant:
James Arthur Nilsson, Ben Frye, Erik Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brent Ristow v. Douglas Peterson, et al
as 22-3029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brent A. Ristow
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas R. Peterson, Thomas Henry Boyd, Juan G. Hoyos and others
Watson v. Hennepin County et al
as 0:2022cv02266
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Watson
Defendant:
Hennepin County, Nick Peterson and J. Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ombuna et al v. Johnson et al
as 0:2022cv02056
Plaintiff:
Costas Ombuna and Jazzlyn Brown
Defendant:
Cody Johnson, C. Peterson, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pope v. Chauvin et al
as 0:2022cv01434
Plaintiff:
John Christopher Pope, Jr.
Defendant:
Derek Chauvin, Alexander Walls, Joshua Domek and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Turner v. Eagan Best Buy et al
as 0:2022cv01255
Plaintiff:
Derrick Devon Turner
Defendant:
Eagan Best Buy, Eagan Police Department, Dane N. Winget and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
