Cases 71 - 80 of 434
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Moore v. Knodell et al
as 4:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
Andrew Peal Moore, II
Defendant:
Robert J. Knodell, Jennifer Renner, M. Ruth O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bligh v. Ruden et al
as 0:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Amy Julia Bligh
Defendant:
Andrew Ruden and Nicholas Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warren v. Forney et al
as 0:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Darrell Warren
Defendant:
Meg Forney, Andrew Klein and Karl Zabinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
K.J. v. City of Waseca et al
as 0:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
K. J. and K.J.
Defendant:
City of Waseca, Police Chief Penny Vought, Police Officer Andrew Harren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Metzler v. Luger
as 0:2022cv03212
Plaintiff:
Brian Metzler
Defendant:
Andrew M. Luger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson et al v. Bailey et al
as 4:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Ronald Benson, Derrick Hall, Dawn Johnson and others
Defendant:
Eric Schmitt, Michael Sack, St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Laducer et al v. Essentia Health et al
as 3:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
Luke M. Laducer, Diana Decoteau, Brooklyn Laducer and others
Defendant:
Essentia Health, Cass, County of, Jesse Jahner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Tapley et al
as 4:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
Brittany Byrd
Defendant:
William Tapley, Chris Harris, Clayton Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Manning v. Richardson et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Manning
Defendant:
Cindy LuAnn Richardson, Sandra Lowburg, Susan Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
