Cases 81 - 90 of 463
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-3265
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wassef v. Nebel et al
as 4:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Shafik Wassef
Defendant:
Kent Nebel and Thomas J. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dj Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Scott Youngbear v. Attorney General Tom Miller
as 22-1279
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Scott Louis Youngbear
Defendant / Appellee:
Attorney General Tom Miller
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 4:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Clervrain et al v. Ferriero et al
as 4:2021cv00405
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Osei Fosu Fran Cobbina, Osei Fosu Francis Cobbina and others
Defendant:
David Ferriero, Ross Wilburn, June Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Youngbear v. Miller
as 1:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Scott Louis Youngbear
Defendant:
Attorney General Tom Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. Engel et al
as 3:2021cv03020
Plaintiff:
Seneca Lovett Engel
Defendant:
Derek Engel, Miller Police Department, City of Miller, South Dakota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aga et al v. Meade County et al
as 5:2021cv05059
Plaintiff:
Kalyn Aga, Randy Aga, Courtney Ahrendt and others
Defendant:
Meade County, KNAUF KG a German Corporation and United States Gypsum Corporation, (USG Corporation) an Illinois Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hershey v. City of Springfield et al
as 6:2021cv03255
Plaintiff:
Richard Hershey
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Clif Smart, Gabriel Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngbear v. Miller
as 1:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Scott Louis Youngbear
Defendant:
Attorney General Tom Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
