Cases 1 - 10 of 383
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Pennington-Thurman v. Jenkerson et al
as 4:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Wilma Pennington-Thurman
Defendant:
Dennis M. Jenkerson, Unknown Erb, Robert J. Tracy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Close et al v. City of Bellevue Iowa et al
as 2:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lee Close and Colton Hancock
Defendant:
City of Bellevue Iowa, Dennis Schroeder, Ryan Kloft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Eborka v. University of Nebraska-Lincoln
as 8:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Dennis Eborka
Defendant:
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eborka v. Wayne State College
as 8:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Dennis Eborka
Defendant:
Wayne State College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Jay Nygard v. City of Orono, et al
as 24-1232
Plaintiff:
Jay Nygard
Defendant:
City of Orono, A Minnesota Municipality, Dennis Sabourin Walsh, Orono Mayor, in his individual and official capacities, Dennis Sabourin Walsh, Orono Resident and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
