Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Smith v. City of St. Charles et al
as 4:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Amanda Watson, Jeffrey R. Norman, Officer Stanczak and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy E. Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Powell
as 4:2020cv01367
Plaintiff:
William E Smith
Defendant:
C Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Hutchinson et al
as 3:2019cv00082
Defendant:
Sylvia Wear, Cindy Gillespie, Alfred Hogan and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Smith and Tiffany E Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Ficcadenti et al
as 0:2017cv00496
Plaintiff:
Frank A. Baker
Defendant:
Brian Ficcadenti , Brett Palkowitsch , Brian Norwicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Geico Insurance Corporation et al
as 5:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Defendant:
Geico Insurance Corporation , Tony Nicely , Rebecca Campox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jordan Smith v. Willard Romney, et al
as 12-1456
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jordan B. Smith, Rec. L. D. S.
Plaintiff:
David E. Smith, Rev. L. D. S.
Defendant - Appellee:
Willard Mitt Romney, L. D. S., Thomas S. Monson, Rev. L. D. S. Business Manager, Terry Snapp, Rev. Stone Church Pastor and others
Smith et al v. Romney et al
as 4:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jordan B Smith and David E. Smith
Defendant:
Willard Mitt Romney, Thomas S Monson, Terry Snapp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Gorman et al
as 0:2011cv03071
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Smith
Defendant:
Timothy Gorman , Timothy Callahan and Minneapolis, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
