Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Mays et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Mays and Tommy Holmes
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Mark Joseph Suchta, Alan Douglas Salvosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byers v. May et al
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Kevin Byers
Defendant:
Brendan May, John Does and Augusta, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Otis Mays, Jr. v. Travis Yarbrough, et al
as 24-1189
Plaintiff:
Otis Ray Mays, Jr.
Defendant:
Travis Yarbrough, Richard Waller and John Doe
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. May
as 4:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Dottie Anderson
Defendant:
Bobby May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Edwards v. Stevens et al
as 4:2023cv04106
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey W. Edwards
Defendant:
Michael Stevens, Tyler Matson and Lisa May Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Casey-El et al v. City of St. Louis Department of Public Safety et al
as 4:2022cv01225
Plaintiff:
Sammy Lee Casey-El, Walter Tolbert and Gwen Thompson
Defendant:
City of St. Louis Department of Public Safety, Civilian Over-Sight Board, Louisa Lyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
