Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Doward v. City of Kettle River et al
as 0:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
Monique Annette Doward
Defendant:
City of Kettle River, David C. Lucas, Kathryn M. Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Bryan v. O'Bryan et al
as 3:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Taylor O'Bryan
Defendant:
Victoria O'Bryan, Cheyenne River Sioux Tribal Court, Brenda Claymore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jason Bethune v. SSA, et al
as 23-3324
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jason Lavet Bethune
Defendant / Appellee:
Social Security Administration, Grand River Office, Mr. Barret, Ms. Meadows and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mize et al v. St. Louis County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2023cv00913
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Mize, A.D.M. and J.C.M.
Defendant:
St. Louis County Circuit Court, Missouri Secretary of State, Citizens National Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
