Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Fayetteville Public Library et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05086
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, Todd Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barbier v. Missouri Real Estate Commission et al
as 4:2019cv02390
Defendant:
Missouri Real Estate Commission (MREC), Sherry Farrell, Charles Misko and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Barbier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00259
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Missouri v. Cross
as 4:2018cv01524
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri
Defendant:
Farrell Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1455
Young v. Blytheville Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv00334
Plaintiff:
Travis Young
Defendant:
Blytheville Police Department, Ross Thompson, Matt Huckabay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farrell v. Keedy et al
as 5:2015cv06162
Defendant:
Thomas Keedy, Tim Corwin, Scott Probasco and others
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lynn Farrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miles et al v. Webb et al
as 3:2015cv00335
Plaintiff:
Michael G Miles and Farrell E Miles
Defendant:
Webb and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dahir et al v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2015cv02632
Plaintiff:
Abdulkarim Mohamed Dahir, Halima Ahmed Hagi, Aisha Abdulkarim Mohamed and others
Defendant:
Anoka County, Samantha Kloos, Don Ilse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1930
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Moon v. Poinsett County Detention Center et al
as 3:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
Shawn Farrell Moon
Defendant:
Poinsett County Detention Center and Joey Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
