Cases 21 - 30 of 176
Jasper v. Does
as 4:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Esrial Jasper
Defendant:
Does, Nancy Miles, Shanda Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doranti v. Kniesel et al
as 0:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Terry Kniesel, Ann Linkert, Cory Vargason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Adam Hageman, et al v. MNDOC, et al
as 22-2098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adam R. Hageman
Plaintiff:
Khalil Billups
Defendant / Appellee:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Lt. J. Rykken, Lt. Engeldinger and others
Haukoos v. Miles et al
as 0:2022cv01142
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Haukoos
Respondent:
Eddie Miles and MCF - St Cloud
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Haukous v. Miles et al
as 4:2022cv04059
Petitioner:
Michael Allen Haukous and Michael Allen Haukoos
Respondent:
Warden Eddie Miles and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kelvin Miles v. Dir. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 22-1585
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kelvin J. Miles
Defendant / Appellee:
Director of U.S. Bureau of Prisons, Bureau of Prisons and Warden S. Kallas, Federal Medical Center
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv01206
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Rory Griffin, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02606
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Prouty
Defendant:
David N. Miles, Matt Dahl, Derek J. Koecher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles
as 0:2021cv02460
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv02438
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
Nancy Johnson, Jodi Harpstead, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
