Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Mobley v. Villmer
as 4:2011cv00765
Petitioner:
Jerry L. Mobley
Respondent:
Tom Villmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nathaniel Fitzgerald v. Teresa Bonner, et al
as 11-2479
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathaniel Fitzgerald
Defendant - Appellee:
Teresa Bonner, Chief Jailer, Crittenden County Detention Center, Richard Busby, Sheriff, Crittenden County Detention Center, Zane Boyd, Administrator, Crittenden County Detention Center and others
Venzant v. Coleman et al
as 3:2011cv00116
Plaintiff:
Larry Darnell Venzant
Defendant:
Coleman , Teressa Bonner , Gamble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 11-2315
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Henderson v. Brewer et al
as 5:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Harold Henderson
Defendant:
David Brewer, Larry Norris, Roland Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mangum v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2011cv00047
Plaintiff:
Randy Mangum
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Crittenden County, Arkansas, Crittenden County Detention Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Porter v. Thomas Koch
as 10-3674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andre Porter
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Koch
Nesby et al v. Boyd et al
as 3:2010cv00197
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nesby and Rodrigues Jones
Defendant:
Zane Boyd, Teresa Bonner, Linsey Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eugene Jones-El v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-2320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eugene Kenneth Jones-El
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Stewart Epps and others
Hall et al v. Busby et al
as 3:2010cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ted Hall, Sydney Tate and Herbert Holmes
Defendant:
Richard Busby, Terresa Bonner, Zane Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
