Cases 31 - 40 of 400
Lee v. Patterson et al
as 4:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Mariquse McCan, Cieria Wasghington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kyle Parks v. United States
as 23-2812
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kyle Maurice Parks
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Kyle Parks v. United States
as 23-2811
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kyle Maurice Parks
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Rogers v. United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
as 1:2023cv00147
Petitioner:
Lemont Maurice Rogers
Respondent:
United States District Court for the District of North Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owen v. USA
as 0:2023cv02294
Petitioner:
Maurice Antonio Owen
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 4:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Michael Lee Catton, Nicholas Raymond Mark, Nicholas J. Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Sarah Sanders, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Catton et al
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Christian Sean Hicks
Defendant:
Officer Michael Lee Catton, Officer Nicholas Raymond Mark, Officer Nicholas J Berger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Burleigh Morton County Detention Center: N.D. et al
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Lemont Maurice Rogers
Defendant:
Burleigh Morton County Detention Center: N.D. and Bismarck N.D. Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chris Welch v. United States
as 23-2704
Petitioner / Appellant:
Chris Maurice Welch
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
