Cases 31 - 40 of 307
Stephen Morris v. Gregory Hancock
as 23-2158
Petitioner / Appellant:
Stephen Patrick Morris
Respondent / Appellee:
Gregory Hancock, Warden
Boyce v. City of Fulton, Missouri et al
as 2:2023cv04111
Plaintiff:
James Edward Boyce
Defendant:
City of Fulton, Missouri, Fulton Police Department, Jonathan Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Combee v. USA
as 4:2023cv00559
Petitioner:
Raymond Morris Allen Combee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walter Cartwright, III v. David Krabbenhoft, et al
as 23-1456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Walter William Cartwright, III
Defendant / Appellee:
David Krabbenhoft, Director, Suing in Official and Individual Capacity, North Dakota State Pen, James Sayler, N.D.S.P. Warden, Suing in Official and Individual Capacity, Renee Morris, RN, Suing in Official and Individual Capacity, North Dakota State Pen and others
Morris v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 4:2023cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Morris
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction and Faulkner, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris Brown v. United States
as 23-1395
Petitioner / Appellant:
Morris Devon Brown
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Levy v. USA
as 5:2023cv05032
Petitioner:
Robert Morris Levy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Morris v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Damien Morris
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Hancock
as 4:2023cv00167
Petitioner:
Stephen P. Morris
Respondent:
Gregory Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brickle-Hicks v. Sayler
as 1:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Morris Jerome Brickle-Hicks
Respondent:
James Sayler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
