Cases 41 - 50 of 102
Stricklin v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 5:2014cv00039
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Stricklin
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Correctional Medical Services Inc, Corizon Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Z.D. v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2012cv02144
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Thomas Villmer, Missouri Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Z.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
de la Garza v Roy et al
as 0:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Cesar de la Garza
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Corizon Inc., Nanette Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Rothman v. George Lombardi, et al
as 14-1051
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Edward Rothman
Defendant - Appellee:
George Lombardi, Director, Official Capacity, Charles Chastain, Kyle Webb and others
Bounds v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv03470
Plaintiff:
Jack Lee Bounds
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc. , Dr. Conley , Dr. Ibrahim, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tubbs v. Corizon Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00377
Plaintiff:
William R Tubbs
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Crystal Woods, Estella Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 2:2013cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D Morgan
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Danny Burl, DeAngelo Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bridges v. Corizon Inc et al
as 5:2013cv00366
Plaintiff:
William Earl Bridges
Defendant:
Corizon Inc, Wendy Kelley, Roy Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitfield v. West et al
as 2:2013cv04234
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Whitfield
Defendant:
Douglas A. West, Corizon, Inc. f/k/a Correctional Medical Services, Inc., ("CMS") and Jihad Ibrahim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mason v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 6:2013cv06110
Defendant:
Corizon, Inc., Wanetta Clowers, Aric Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
James Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
