Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Benjamin Muhammad Jones v. Kendrick Nelson, et al
as 16-3150
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Benjamin Muhammad Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Kendrick Nelson, Captain, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Andrew Ruh and others
Jones v. Burl et al
as 5:2016cv00191
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Muhammad Jones
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Aundrea F Fitzgerald, Latoya Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. USA
as 4:2016cv00460
Movant:
Theotis A Muhammad
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Muhammad v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00197
Plaintiff:
Abdul Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
J R Smith and Mike Buchand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Green et al
as 2:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Abdul Elijah Muhammad
Defendant:
Virgal Green, Byrd, Juanita Blue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benjamin Jones v. Thomas Miller, et al
as 15-3637
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Benjamin Muhammad Jones and Benjamin Muhammad Jones
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Miller, Sergeant, Warren Police Department, Brian Martin, Mayor, City of Warren, Mike Warren, Patrolman, Warren Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra E. Muhammad and Gina Anderson
Muhammad v. Tecumseh State Corrections et al
as 4:2015cv03136
Defendant:
Scott Busboom, Medical Dept. and Tecumseh State Corrections
Plaintiff:
Iman Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. King et al
as 5:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhammad
Defendant:
A King, Snow, Chisom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Robinson et al
as 5:2015cv00240
Plaintiff:
Azeez Muhammad
Defendant:
Greg Bolin , Edward Adams and Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Wheeler et al
as 5:2015cv00130
Plaintiff:
Abdulhakim Muhammad
Defendant:
Mark Wheeler , Randy Watson and Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
