Cases 41 - 50 of 2,419
Pace v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Dakota Pace
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Nebraska Department of Correctional Services et al
as 8:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Monroe G. Evans, III
Defendant:
Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, Craig Gable, Scott Busboom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Write A Prisoner.com
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Dushawn X. Scott and Dushaun X. Scott
Defendant:
Write A Prisoner and Write A Prisoner.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McSean v. Foot et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Kelly McSean
Defendant:
Roy Foot, Unknown Halek, Katie Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr v. St. Louis County Justice Center et al
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Anthony Farr
Defendant:
St. Louis County Justice Center, Attorney Patrick Scott Kilgore, Judge Kristine A. Kerr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moon v. USA
as 4:2024cv04023
Petitioner:
Michael Scott Moon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carlson v. Burdick
as 1:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
Sergei Isaac Scott Carlson
Respondent:
Birch P. Burdick and Joseph Joyce
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeffrey Gundersen v. United States
as 24-1032
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Scott Gundersen
Respondent:
United States of America
Scott v. Write A Prisoner.com
as 3:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Dushaun X. Scott and Dushaun X Scott
Defendant:
Write A Prisoner.com
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
