Cases 1 - 10 of 1,399
Askew v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06127
Defendant:
Warden Walter White, Corporal Seiger, Kelly Aunspaugh and others
Plaintiff:
Mu and Frank Askew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03670
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Petitioner:
Oscar Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vardeman v. St. Charles Co. Detention Center et al
as 4:2024cv01227
Defendant:
Srgt. Unknown Shanks, Nurse Unknown A., C/O Unknown Nickson and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Vardeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long v. Hoag et al
as 4:2024cv01228
Defendant:
Zachary J. Borowiak, Draymond M. Foster, Megan Bradshaw and others
Plaintiff:
Mario B. Long, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00739
Defendant:
Marshall Reed, Willam Straughn, Michael Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Lewien
as 4:2024cv03153
Respondent:
Barbara Lewien
Petitioner:
David B. Brown
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03432
Petitioner:
Fredrick Stewart
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Langram v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03305
Petitioner:
Donald Langram
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thomas v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03242
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Petitioner:
Ray Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lovette v. Eischen
as 0:2024cv03148
Petitioner:
James Cornell Lovette
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
