Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 750
Riley v. Buckner
as 4:2024cv00415
Petitioner: Donald E Riley
Defendant: Michele Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dismuke v. Dunham et al
as 4:2024cv00486
Plaintiff: Donald D Dismuke, Jr
Defendant: James Dunham and Steven G Higgins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Yetman et al
as 4:2024cv00776
Plaintiff: Donald R. Cook
Defendant: Officer M. Yetman, A. Shumate and St. Francois County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff: Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant: Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winnett v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00410
Plaintiff: Donald F Winnett
Defendant: Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Wirth et al v. Burton et al
as 0:2024cv01595
Plaintiff: Donald Joseph Wirth, Jr and Nicholas Thomas Stroeder
Defendant: James Julis Burton, Jane Doe Number 1, Jane Doe Number 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Titus v. Omega Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2024cv06056
Plaintiff: Michael Titus
Defendant: Double Tree Parking Garage, East End Towing, PPP Grants and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willingham v. Reyes
as 4:2024cv04069
Petitioner: Donald Willingham
Respondent: Warden Reyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Mullenix v. United States
as 24-1722
Petitioner: Donald Ryan Mullenix
Respondent: United States of America
Michael Titus v. Scarface, et al
as 24-1725
Plaintiff: Michael Titus, ADC #168523
Defendant: Scarface, Movie, Al Pacino, Director of Scarface, Keef Coff Group and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?