Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Macbolan v. Valley Rental et al
as 3:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Baker Chris Macbolan
Defendant:
Valley Rental and Eagle Crest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jumping Eagle v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv05036
Plaintiff:
James Shawn Jumping Eagle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Eagle v. Higgins et al
as 4:2022cv00915
Plaintiff:
Rudolph Eagle
Defendant:
Higgins, Calvin, Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Yellow Eagle v. United States
as 22-2485
Petitioner / Appellant:
Christopher Yellow Eagle
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Eagle v. Crider
as 0:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jude Eagle and Anthony Jude Feather
Defendant:
Mrs. Crider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yellow Eagle v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv05088
Plaintiff:
Christopher Yellow Eagle
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jumping Eagle v. Yantis et al
as 5:2020cv05017
Plaintiff:
James S. Jumping Eagle and James Shawn Jumping Eagle
Defendant:
Pennington County Jail Nurses N/F/U, United States Marshals, Pennington County Jail Nurses L/N/U and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumping Eagle v. Pennington County Jail
as 5:2019cv05023
Plaintiff:
James J. Jumping Eagle and James S. Jumping Eagle
Defendant:
Pennington County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jumping Eagle v. Yantis et al
as 5:2019cv05015
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Rob Yantis and Nurse F/N/U L/N/U
Plaintiff:
James J. Jumping Eagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagle Boy v. Nebraska Attorney General
as 4:2018cv03021
Petitioner:
Charles R. Eagle Boy
Respondent:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
