Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Carter v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Toby E Carter
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frank v. North Dakota, State of et al
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
North Dakota, State of, Fargo Police Department, Police Officer Toby Carlsson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swaim v. Shannan et al
as 4:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
Toby Lee Swaim
Defendant:
Michael Shannan, Mickey Noble, Katie Yackle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansmeier v. Tobies Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 0:2022cv00932
Plaintiff:
Paul Hansmeier
Defendant:
Tobies Enterprises, Inc. and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Derrick Estell v. Walter Washington, et al
as 22-1411
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick Estell
Defendant / Appellee:
Walter Washington, Lieutenant, Varner SuperMax, Jonathan Martin, Captain, Varner SuperMax, Douglas E. Boultinghouse, Lieutenant, Varner SuperMax and others
Williams v. Howard et al
as 4:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Troy Williams
Defendant:
Woody Howard, Robert Mays, Jimmy Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Douglas Co. Corrections et al
as 8:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Toby Rex Thompson
Defendant:
Douglas Co. Corrections, Amber Dyball, Rebecca Swearingen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00445
Plaintiff:
Devonte King
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, City of North Platte NE and Toby Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Depoister v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2021cv01810
Petitioner:
Toby Depoister
Respondent:
B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Depoister v. Birkholz et al
as 0:2021cv01794
Petitioner:
Toby Depoister
Respondent:
B. Birkholz and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
