Cases 101 - 110 of 165
Davidson v. Petty et al
as 2:2013cv04229
Plaintiff:
Michael Gene Davidson
Defendant:
Jim Petty and Morgan County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petty v. LaGore et al
as 2:2013cv00093
Plaintiff:
Damon Lamonte Petty
Defendant:
Robert LaGore, Unknown Lawzano, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slagle v. Stange et al
as 1:2013cv00154
Plaintiff:
Dennis L. Slagle
Defendant:
Bill Stange, Yolanda Hutchenson, Karen S. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonhomme Investment Partners, LLC et al v. Hayes et al
as 2:2013cv04120
Plaintiff:
Bonhomme Investment Partners, LLC , Donald M Davis and Richard C Lehman
Defendant:
Shaun Hayes, John Doe, officer and/or director of Excel Bank and Investors Financial Corporation of Pettis County, Missouri Inc.
Receiver:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Excel Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Barnes v. Burls et al
as 2:2013cv00057
Defendant:
Danny Burls, Bell, Pettie and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Clayton Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Dawson et al
as 2:2013cv00050
Plaintiff:
Maurice Green
Defendant:
Connie Dawson, Ester Petti, Todd Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cella Funds LLC et al v. Hayes et al
as 2:2013cv04092
Plaintiff:
Cella Funds LLC , Donald M Davis , Joan M Davis and others
Defendant:
Shaun Hayes , John Doe, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Excel Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Petty v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Rex Petty
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Petty v. McGrew
as 4:2013cv00090
Petitioner:
Keith Martell Petty
Respondent:
McGrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
