Cases 121 - 130 of 3,258
Jackson v. Buffalo County et al
as 8:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Buffalo County, Nathan R. Arehart, State of Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Jackson et al v. Exactech Inc et al
as 4:2023cv01182
Plaintiff:
Jaryel Jackson and Ivona Jackson
Defendant:
Exactech Inc doing business as Exactech and Exactech US Inc doing business as Exactech
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Cook v. Circuit Court of Jackson County, MO
as 4:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Lynn D. Cook, Sr.
Defendant:
Circuit Court of Jackson County, MO
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Maxwell v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Maxwell
Defendant:
Stephan Lane, Tyrone Allison, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Doe et al
as 0:2023cv03750
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Jackson
Defendant:
John Doe and James Bets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03706
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Jackson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Ronald Jackson v. United States
as 23-3595
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00064
Plaintiff:
Adrian Robert Jackson
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Myles Strid, Ronda L. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
