Cases 121 - 130 of 191
McClain et al v. Robertson et al
as 4:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Martin McClain , Ashley McDaniel , Stacy Gall and others
Defendant:
Adam Robertson , James Potter , Joseph Breaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00161
Defendant:
Scotty Clark, Engler, Daughtery and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thurman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv02021
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Thurman
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Scotty Clark, Unknown Engler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: INGE
as 4:2014mc00597
Movant:
J.P. MORGAN SECURITIES LLC, , WAMU CAPITAL CORP , DAVID M. DUZYK and others
Respondent:
THERESA INGE
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
United States v. Richard Mathi
as 14-2396
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Richard Mathis
Mathis v. Biomet, Inc. et al.
as 4:2014cv03043
Defendant:
Biomet Manufacturing, Biomet Orthopedics, Biomet U.S. Reconstruction and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Mathis, NE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mathis v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00217
Plaintiff:
Tamikia Mathis
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , N.V. Organon , Schering Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cedrick Mhoon v. Jeremy Disotell, et al
as 14-1264
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cedrick Mhoon
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeremy Disotell, Patrolman, Conway Police Department, Brian A. Busby, Patrolman, Conway Police Department, T. G. Cooper, Patrolman, Conway Police Department and others
Mathis v USA
as 3:2013cv00089
Petitioner:
Richard Mathis
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mathis
as 3:2013cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
