Cases 131 - 140 of 19,515
State of Missouri v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00048
Defendant:
Evansville Electric & Manufacturing Co., Inc., Progress Energy, National Grid USA Service Company and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri and United States on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Smith v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff:
Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant:
USA, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Pulaski County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. USA
as 2:2024cv02031
Petitioner:
Brent Presley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brown v. USA
as 4:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Xavier Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Alva-Joya v. USA
as 4:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Ali Alva-Joya
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Gatling v. USA
as 4:2024cv00348
Petitioner:
Dionne Lamont Gatling
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Brown v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2024cv00767
Plaintiff:
Peter Brown
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group, S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Mullenix v. USA
as 4:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Donald Ryan Mullenix
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mussmann v. USA
as 4:2024cv00342
Petitioner:
George Frederick Mussmann, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
