Cases 11 - 20 of 690
Happy Stompingbear v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 24-1011
Plaintiff:
Happy Stompingbear, also known as Chris Ward
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC, Marvin Evans and others
McNeal v. Calvin et al
as 4:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Syreeta LaShawn McNeal, Esq.
Defendant:
Vera L. Calvin, Anthony T. Lofties, Joann A. Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doss v. Jenkins et al
as 4:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Doss
Defendant:
David Jenkins, Joe Swaim, Ashley Sparks and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3752
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Patricia Jackson, et al v. Tyson Foods
as 23-3753
Plaintiff:
Patricia Jackson, Mac Roger Jenkins, John Sims and others
Defendant:
Tyson Foods
Jenkins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03656
Plaintiff:
Rossmon Jenkins, Jr. and Bernadette Jenkins
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Parkins v. Staten et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Parkins
Defendant:
Deigarion M Staten, Scott Taylor, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Betty Jenkins v. Warden Michael Segal
as 23-3550
Petitioner / Appellant:
Betty Lee Jenkins
Respondent / Appellee:
Warden Michael Segal
Radford v. Jenkins-White et al
as 2:2023cv00227
Plaintiff:
Tommy Radford
Defendant:
Angela Jenkins-White and Moses Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 0:2023cv03411
Plaintiff:
Davin Jenkins
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
