Cases 11 - 20 of 504
Mujuni et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02802
Plaintiff:
Richard Mujuni, Bright Twambale, Moses Taremwa and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Mande et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
Abbey Mande, Moses Mangat, Geofrey Maniraguha and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Matsiko et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02799
Plaintiff:
George Matsiko, Ramadhani Amiisi Matte, Vincent Maviiri and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Ssemukuutu et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Godfrey Ssemukuutu, Allan Ssemwanga, Badru Ssemwogerere and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Katushabe et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02741
Plaintiff:
Fred Katushabe, Augustine Katwaza, Ssekamatte Daniel Kauma and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Ntwaasi et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02723
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kitatta Ntwaasi, Abraham Nuwagaba, Boaz Nuwagaba and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technolgies LLC
Chuol v. Nebraska Attorney General et al
as 8:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gamar G. Chuol
Defendant:
Nebraska Attorney General, Douglas County District Attornies, Katie Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Stofferahn et al
as 0:2023cv02386
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeffrey Jones
Defendant:
Anthony C Stofferahn, Robert J Conway, Margaret Astrup and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benson v. Harpstead
as 0:2023cv02377
Plaintiff:
Michael Benson
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Bryan Benson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
