Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Abdus-Shahid Ali v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 15-1287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Abdus-Shahid M.S. Ali
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Director, Bureau of Prisons, Harley G. Lappin, Former Director, Bureau of Prisons, Juan D. Castillo, Warden, USMCFP and others
Shah v. Samuels et al
as 4:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
Vivek Shah
Defendant:
Charles E Samuels, Jr, USA and Jose A Santana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04168
Plaintiff:
Travis Emory Correll
Defendant:
The United States of America, Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04158
Petitioner:
Travis Emory Correll
Respondent:
The United States of America , Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3167
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv03238
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Lacey v. Burns, et al
as 1:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
William Perry Lacey
Defendant:
Warden Chandler, Charles E Samuels, Jr and Teresa Burns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernando Bustillo v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-3482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr. Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Paul M. Laird, Federal Bureau of Prisons North Central Regional Director, Juan Castillo, Warden and others
Eddington v. Samuels et al
as 6:2013cv03438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Eddington
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Paul M Laird, Newton E Kendig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Mock et al
as 0:2013cv02520
Plaintiff:
Kirt R. King
Defendant:
Barbara Mock, Denise Wilson, Paul M. Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
