Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Michael Simpson v. FCC Forrest City Low, et al
as 15-1775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dale Simpson
Defendant - Appellee:
FCC Forrest City Low, Medical Department, B. Wooten, Registered Nurse, FCC Forrest City Low, M. Wingo, Physician Assistant, FCC Forrest City Low and others
Marvin Cobb v. T. C. Outlaw, et al
as 15-1379
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Marvin Cobb
Defendant - Appellee:
T. C. Outlaw, Warden, Forrest City Complex, Ronald Smith, Safety Manager, FCC Forrest City and A. Haynes, Warden, FCC Forrest City
Simpson v. FCC Forrest City
as 2:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Michael Dale Simpson
Defendant:
FCC Forrest City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. FCC Forrest City et al
as 2:2014cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonathan I Hill
Defendant:
FCC Forrest City and Anthony Haynes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-3396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Davenport, SIS, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-3116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Davenport, Charles Samuels, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Banks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Darrell Eugene Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, T Outlaw, Nadar Peikar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-2995
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, an American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee:
Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Banks v. Samuels et al
as 4:2013cv00482
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Charles Samuels, Eric Holder, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
