Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Quinn v. Department of Justice
as 4:2021cv00102
Defendant:
Polk County Sheriff's Office, Royal Motel, Intercontinental Sait Paul Riverfront Hotel and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Higgins
as 4:2020cv01194
Plaintiff:
Leodis Randle
Defendant:
Justice Department, State Circuit Court and Eric S Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Quinn v. Justice Department Office of Civil Right et al
as 0:2020cv01774
Defendant:
Regions Hospital, Justice Department Office of Civil Right, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Justice Department Office of Civil Right et al
as 0:2020cv01591
Defendant:
Walgreen, Union Depot, US Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01574
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Quinn v. Department of Justice et al
as 0:2020cv00563
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, Minneapolis Police Department, St. Paul Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Justice Department
as 4:2017cv00348
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Defendant:
Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quinn v. Justice Department
as 4:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Andrew Quinn
Defendant:
Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v. Treasury Department et al
as 3:2014cv03044
Plaintiff:
Jim Stevens
Defendant:
Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service, George H.W. Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2011cv00270
Petitioner:
Harold Lindsey Webster
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and US Justice Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
