Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Garey v. Langley et al
as 2:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr
Defendant:
Rhonda Langley, Rosemary Stiles, P Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Grigsdie et al
as 4:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Rickie Green
Defendant:
Marge Grigsdie, McCoy, J Staley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Godbold v. Hammons et al
as 6:2016cv06073
Plaintiff:
Tyrong Godbold
Defendant:
John Hammons , Patrick Langley , Hot Springs, The City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Langley
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs , Wendy Kelley , Larry Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Watson et al
as 6:2014cv06135
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Campbell
Defendant:
Jason Watson , Larry Cain , Ben Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Gild Holdings Inc et al v. Langley et al
as 4:2013cv00333
Plaintiff:
Gild Holdings Inc and Steven Cherry
Defendant:
Michael Langley and Alcoholic Beverage Control Division of the State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Rodgers v. Matthews et al
as 4:2013cv00327
Plaintiff:
James Ryan Rodgers
Defendant:
Matthews , Reid , Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rueben v. Outlaw et al
as 2:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Rueben
Defendant:
T C Outlaw, D W Heuett, William Resto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wade v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Denise Wade
Defendant:
Baptist Health , Debra Langley and Naomi Wallis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act-1993
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
