Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Tarone Jones v. United States
as 22-2446
Petitioner:
Tarone M. Jones
Respondent:
United States of America
Jones v. Kulesa et al
as 4:2022cv00545
Plaintiff:
Tamala T Jones
Defendant:
Logan K Kulesa, Shawn M Jones, Jacksonville, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Spotted Elk v. Young et al
as 4:2022cv04031
Defendant:
Jessica Cook, Jeannie Bertch, Darrin Young and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gregory Spotted Elk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Dustin M Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rindahl v. Noem et al
as 4:2020cv04176
Defendant:
M. Liedholt, L. Lenter, A. Madsen and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amanda Jones v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
as 20-2728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Amanda M. Jones, Individually and on Behalf of all Arkansans Similarly Situated
Defendant / Appellee:
Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Jones et al v. Deca Realty et al
as 4:2020cv01042
Defendant:
Joe Unknown, Deca Realty, Bedrock Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sharron M. Williams and Carolyn M. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Humes v. White County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2020cv00479
Defendant:
Hall, Clayton Edwards, Phillip Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Humes, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aspen American Insurance Company v. Jones et al
as 0:2020cv00659
Defendant:
Twin Cities Dental Center, P.A., Michael Dan Smilanich, D.D.S., Ltd., Michael Dan Smilanich and others
Plaintiff:
Aspen American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
