Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Roth et al v. Austin et al
as 8:2022cv03038
Plaintiff:
Tanner W. Roth, Jon W. Smithley, Logan M. Priebe and others
Defendant:
Lloyd J. Austin, III, United States Department of Defense, Frank Kendall, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Stevenson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2021cv00106
Plaintiff:
Gregory E. Stevenson
Defendant:
Cliff Jackson, Ciara Shaffer, Zackery Boyed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boland et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00766
Plaintiff:
Carol Mangione, Belinda Luna, Vickie Morris and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., PTI Royston, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1976
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
McMillan v. 3M Company et al.
as 0:2021cv00873
Defendant:
3M Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
John McMillan
McMillan v. 3M Company et al.
as 0:2021cv00874
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo Intermediate LLC, Aearo Technologies LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph McMillan
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
Raper v. Deen et al
as 4:2021cv00097
Defendant:
Denise McMillan and Thomas Deen
Plaintiff:
James M Raper, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Amador v. Nate Pare, et al
as 21-1044
Defendant / Appellee:
Nate Pare, Cecilia Abbott, John and Jane Does 1-40 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Edward Amador
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
