Cases 11 - 20 of 168
Scharnhorst v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2022cv05243
Plaintiff:
John William Scharnhorst, III
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Jay Cantrell, Captain Nolan Ake, Sergeant Carlos Pineda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rollins v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv01521
Plaintiff:
Josh Rollins
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Joseph Cavins, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 21-1850
Defendant / Appellant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Joseph Cavins, Josh Rollins and Brandon Fuller
Rubin Weeks v. Kimberly Birch, et al
as 21-1270
Defendant / Appellee:
Nina Hill, N.P., individually and in her official capacity as an employee of Corizon, Becky Lizenbee, L.P.N., individually and in her official capacity as an employee of Corizon, Kathy Barton, R.N., individually and in her official capacity as Director of Nursing, Corizon and others
Defendant:
Jason Lewis, individually and in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rubin R. Weeks
Rollins v. USA
as 2:2020cv04252
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maurice Jamall Rollins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cavins et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02408
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cavins, Josh Rollins and Brandon Fuller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Rollins v. Saul
as 6:2020cv03334
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Sherri J. Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rollins v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2020cv00239
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Rollins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mattingly v. Miller Transporters, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Miller Transporters, Inc. and Deryel Rollins
Plaintiff:
Gary Mattingly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
