Cases 11 - 20 of 27
El-Mu Min aka James Lenoir v. Cassady et al
as 2:2017cv04017
Plaintiff:
Shyheim Deen El-Mu Min aka James Lenoir
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Matthew Newman, Caleb Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Teter v. Schofield et al
as 2:2016cv04271
Plaintiff:
Randy Teter
Defendant:
Schofield, Lamberson and Hiekal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Schofield et al
as 4:2016cv00877
Plaintiff:
William John Wills, III
Defendant:
Erica Schofield, Cameron, Pittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schofield et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv02800
Plaintiff:
Kathryn M. Schofield and James J. Schofield
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics and Stryker Ireland Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott et al v. Buray Energy International, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00548
Plaintiff:
Joe H. Scott, Sr. and Loretta A. Scott
Defendant:
Buray Energy International, LLC, 4 Square Gas, LLC, Donald J. Portell and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2615
Schofield v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv04382
Plaintiff:
Barbara Schofield
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Irving v. Cassady et al
as 2:2014cv04237
Plaintiff:
William Irving
Defendant:
Jay Cassady, Thomas Brigance, Paul Gore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving v. Miller et al
as 2:2013cv04141
Plaintiff:
William Irving
Defendant:
C. Miller, Huckstaff, Tonya Rusk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morneau v. Sims et al
as 4:2012cv04109
Defendant:
Mark D Sims , James Wolfe , Jackie Runion and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kellogg Morneau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Schofield v. Roy Hopkin
as 12-2289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Schofield
Defendant - Appellee:
Roy Hopkins, Missouri Department of Corrections, General Manager (MUE Laundry), Moberly Correctional Center, Official and Individual Capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
