Cases 21 - 30 of 349,870
Andrews v. Well Path et al
as 4:2024cv00455
Plaintiff:
Donald S Andrews, Jr
Defendant:
Well Path, Corrective Care Solutions, Wendy Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01937
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Lewis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Riddick v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv05116
Plaintiff:
Cassie Riddick and Glenn Chamberlain
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Company, Inc. and DOES 1-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Kersh v. Phillips RS North America, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02066
Defendant:
Phillips RS North America, LLC doing business as Respironics Inc. formerly known as Respironics, Inc, Respironics, Inc and Phillips Holding USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ima Kersh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thompson v. Douglas County Corrections et al
as 8:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Thompson, Sr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections, Michael Myers, Lt. Sanduski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Etherly et al
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Aaron T Dillard
Defendant:
Marcus Etherly, Kenyon Randle and Monicka Branscomb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. City of Sedalia, Missouri
as 2:2024cv04080
Plaintiff:
Shelley Hicks
Defendant:
City of Sedalia, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doty v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01929
Plaintiff:
John Doty
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Besozzi v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01926
Plaintiff:
Michael Besozzi
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
