Cases 21 - 30 of 3,685
United States v. Thomas Davis
as 24-1836
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Thomas Lamont Davis, also known as Tuck, also known as Tuc
Brooks-Davis v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Avery Brooks-Davis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Brian Davis, Jr.
as 24-1802
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Brian Keith Davis, Jr.
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Jackson et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Wallace Tremayne Robinson, Sr
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Brandon Davis, M Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01328
Plaintiff:
Janice L. Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Garman v. Watson et al
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Challen Derek Garman
Defendant:
James Watson, Beth Skinner, Amber Davis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Walls et al v. Sanders et al
as 4:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Ruthie Walls, Jennifer Reynolds, Chandra Williams Davis and others
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Jacob Oliva, Sarah Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Shattuck-Knaebel v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00454
Defendant:
Unknown Nichols, Missouri Department of Corrections, Bed Broker at Fulton Reception Diagnostic Center (2015) and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Shattuck-Knaebel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
