Cases 21 - 30 of 31
Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co Kg v. Larson
as 0:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Achte/Neunte Boll Kino Beteiligungs Gmbh & Co Kg
Defendant:
Kirk Larson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Bolles
as 8:2010cv00419
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
John Bolles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United States v. Terry Boll
as 10-1890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Terry Boll
Sparks v. Bolling
as 4:2010cv00116
Defendant:
Thomas E. Bolling
Plaintiff:
Bobby Sparks
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Allen et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv02915
Plaintiff:
Joann Rita Allen, Joann Rita Allen, Joann Rita Allen and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Hilfiker et al v. Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00149
Defendant:
Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James O Hilfiker and H Max Hilfiker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Greg Boll v. State of Arkansas
as 08-3349
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Greg J. Boll
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Arkansas
Boll v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2008cv01972
Plaintiff:
Greg J Boll
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv04590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rooney v. Joslin et al
as 1:2007cv00147
Plaintiff:
Tommy Rooney
Defendant:
Howard Karl Joslin, Eugene McCormick, Sylvia McCormick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
