Cases 21 - 30 of 49
Whitley v. Baptist Health et al
as 5:2019mc00008
Defendant:
Ironshore Specialty Insurance Company, Continental Casualty Company, Admiral Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Whitley
Woodson v. Diamond Pools LLC
as 4:2019cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ryan Woodson
Defendant:
Diamond Pools LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00001
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sutterfield v. Chenal Healthcare LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00747
Defendant:
Say La Vie LLC, ALG LaVie LLC, Senior Care LaVie LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LaGatha Sutterfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Diamond v. Runion et al
as 4:2018cv04068
Plaintiff:
Willie Diamond
Defendant:
Jackie Runion, Jeffie Walker, Golden Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairchild v. Correct Care Solutions LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Clifford Fairchild
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions LLC, Diamond Drugs Inc, Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitley v. Baptist Health et al
as 4:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
Brian Whitley
Defendant:
Baptist Health , Baptist Health Hospitals , Diamond Risk Insurance LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Diamond State Insurance Company v. Woodruff
as 4:2015cv04085
Plaintiff:
Diamond State Insurance Company
Defendant:
Loyd Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guthrie v. The City of Diamond City, Boone County, Arkansas et al
as 3:2015cv03073
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Guthrie
Counter Claimant:
The City of Diamond City and Edward Zehr
Defendant:
Jan Hudson and Steven Floyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Tuohey v. Chenal Healthcare LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00506
Plaintiff:
Brenda Tuohey
Defendant:
Chenal Healthcare LLC , LaVie Care Centers LLC , CMC II LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
