Cases 21 - 30 of 344
Harper v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Tommy Harper
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Freeman v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Roderick Demarius Freeman
Defendant:
Andre S Harper, Harley Mitchell, Jeff Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Harper v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-2101
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John P. Harper
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Harper v. Warden of FCI Waseca
as 0:2023cv01247
Petitioner:
Kelly Harper
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Waseca
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Muller v. Stange et al
as 1:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Trey Anthony Muller
Defendant:
William Stange, Michael Hyten, Aaron Raines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harper v. Howell et al
as 6:2023cv03088
Plaintiff:
Aden Warr Harper
Defendant:
M. Howell, Danny Smith and Mantle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tanton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
William Tanton, Mark Bailey, Andrew Ito and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Freeman v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Roderick Demarius Freeman
Defendant:
Harper, Mitchell, Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Paschall v. Frank Gable, et al
as 22-3300
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher L. Paschall
Defendant / Appellee:
Chief of Police Frank Gable, Springdale Police Department, City of Springdale, Arkansas, John Doe, Custodian of the Records and others
United States of America v. $28,020.00 United States Currency
as 8:2022cv00362
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
$28,020.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY and $28,020.00 United States Currency
Claimant:
Jackie Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
