Cases 21 - 30 of 2,259
Lewis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lewis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Fry v. Stenseth
as 0:2024cv01538
Petitioner:
Bruce Renault Fry
Respondent:
Lisa Stenseth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andrews v. Roberts et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Johnny Lee Andrews, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ricky Roberts, Gayla Telano, Dr. Deana Hopson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elburki v. Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Mr. Kamel M. Elburki, Kamel M. Elburki and Kamel M Elbarki
Defendant:
Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police Commissioners, David Kenner, Mathew Vaccaro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kee et al v. Lachler et al
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
John Milo Kee and Lisa Kee
Defendant:
Stephen Charles Lachler and Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle and Lisa Lee Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Springer et al v. Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Lisa Springer and 3M Company
Defendant:
Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
