Cases 21 - 30 of 2,637
Joanthony Johnson v. Michele Buckner
as 24-1779
Plaintiff:
Joanthony Johnson
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Warden, SCCC
Dickerson v. Stobie
as 4:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Michelle Marryann Dickerson
Defendant:
Laura Hawk Stobie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Burgess v. State of Missouri, et al
as 24-1731
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Burgess
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Buchanan County, Missouri, City of St. Joseph, Missouri and others
Belt v. City of Rapid City et al
as 5:2024cv05021
Plaintiff:
William Belt
Defendant:
City of Rapid City and Michelle Paulson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Green v. Does et al
as 0:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Deyonta D. Green
Defendant:
John Does, Michelle Skroch, Holly Jensrud and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Frazier v. Buckner
as 1:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Will Frazier, Jr.
Respondent:
Michelle Buckner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Toole v. Danaher et al
as 4:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
Ryan James O'Toole
Defendant:
Dan Danaher, Teena Lenger, Michele Wilhelm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hauge v. Schneider National, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01136
Plaintiff:
Michele Hauge
Defendant:
Schneider National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Love v. Postech Fashion, Inc.
as 0:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Michelle Love
Defendant:
Postech Fashion, Inc. doing business as Chicme
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Hatchett v. Farin et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gerard Hatchett
Defendant:
Captain Farin, Unknown Mail Clerks, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
