Cases 21 - 30 of 3,143
Robinson v. Miller et al
as 8:2024cv00242
Defendant:
Olimi, Gissler, Tim Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Kirk D. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Barns et al
as 4:2024cv03136
Defendant:
Toney Corbin, Josh Barns, Shelby Ridenor and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph Emerson Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv03177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States v. Trevor Miller
as 24-2595
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Trevor Devon Miller
Davis v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Richard Davis
Defendant:
Esther Waller, Rick Dudley, City of Saint Louis, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05062
Plaintiff:
Daphne D. Miller
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Miller v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv03133
Plaintiff:
Bill Miller
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Anderson v. Williams et al
as 4:2024cv00267
Defendant:
Ken Pirc, Anamosa State Penitentiary, Kris Arcy and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Plaintiff:
John Lewis Arthur Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houle v. Bangert et al
as 3:2024cv00121
Defendant:
Todd Allen Ostenson, Grand Forks Correctional Center, Emma Lucille Bangert and others
Plaintiff:
Gilbert John Houle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gladys v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv03116
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gladys Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
