Cases 21 - 30 of 33
McHorse v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2013cv00837
Plaintiff:
Bradly Allen McHorse
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Clay County Social Services, Michael Messer and others
McQuerry v. Phillips et al
as 1:2012cv01060
Plaintiff:
Alfred A. McQuerry
Defendant:
Cathy Phillips, Hamilton H. Singleton, Tennille Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Messer et al v. Fracmaster LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00132
Plaintiff:
Andrew Messer and Joel Wightman
Defendant:
Fracmaster LLC and Don Atencio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Rajinder Singh v. Messer's Crompton Greaves LTD, et al
as 11-3615
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Rajinder Singh
Defendant - Appellee:
Messer's Crompton Greaves Limited, Gautam Thapar, Chairman and CEO, S. M. Trehan, Managing Director and others
Singh v. Messer's Crompton Greaves Limited et al
as 4:2011cv01207
Plaintiff:
Rajinder Singh
Defendant:
Messer's Crompton Greaves Limited , Gautam Thapar , S. M. Trehan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Messer v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv03171
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
William Kelly Messer, II
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Messer v. Davol, Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv00825
Plaintiff:
Elaine Carol Messer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Messer v. Davol, Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv00597
Plaintiff:
Kimberly S. Messer and Kimberly S. Messer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
