Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Hill v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2017cv04056
Plaintiff:
Odell Hill
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Corrections, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2017cv01102
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Osborn & Barr Communications, Inc. and Osborn & Barr Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patricia Turner , Nadine Zook , Anthony Helderman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Odell v. Southern Health Partners, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv05327
Plaintiff:
Christina Odell
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners, Inc. and Tim Helder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Burnell v. Briann et al
as 4:2016cv00610
Plaintiff:
Odell Burnell
Defendant:
Laura Briann, Cole and Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maupin v. Caldwell County, Missouri et al
as 5:2016cv06016
Plaintiff:
Eric Maupin
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Missouri, Jerry Galloway and Brett Odell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borisanov v. Vanderbol et al
as 3:2016cv05003
Plaintiff:
Artem Borisanov
Defendant:
John Steven Vanderbol, III , Scott Walker and David Odell Boyer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maupin v. Caldwell County, Missouri et al
as 5:2015cv06115
Plaintiff:
Eric Maupin
Defendant:
Caldwell County, Missouri, Jerry Galloway and Brett Odell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jessie Hill v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 15-2892
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jessie Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tuckr MSU, Raymond Naylor, Disciplinary Hearing Administrator, Internal Affairs and others
Rhodes v. Kelly
as 5:2015cv00225
Plaintiff:
Odell Rhodes
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ness et al v. Samson Resources et al
as 4:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Odell Ness and Mary Ness
Defendant:
Samson Resources, Samson Investments, KKR (Kravis, Kohlberg, Roberts) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
