Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Paul Gordon v. State of Arkansa
as 15-1168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul M. Gordon
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Arkansas
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04168
Plaintiff:
Travis Emory Correll
Defendant:
The United States of America, Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Correll v. The United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv04158
Petitioner:
Travis Emory Correll
Respondent:
The United States of America , Eric Holder, Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Taft et al v. Branstad et al
as 5:2014cv04042
Plaintiff:
David L Taft, Jr, Paul M Huston, Daniel J Roe and others
Defendant:
Terry Branstad, Jason Smith, Kip Kautsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darnell Moon v. Barron Pratte, et al
as 14-1873
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Darnell Wesley Moon
Defendant - Appellee:
Barron E. Pratte, President/CEO of CTC, Amy Walp, Case Manager, Karen Auners, Director and others
Adair v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2014cv02029
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Adair
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Paul Gordon v. Bonnie Draper
as 14-1233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Paul M. Gordon
Defendant - Appellee:
Bonnie Lee Ann Draper
Fernando Bustillo v. Charles Samuels, et al
as 13-3482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fernando Bustillo
Defendant - Appellee:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr. Federal Bureau of Prisons Director, Paul M. Laird, Federal Bureau of Prisons North Central Regional Director, Juan Castillo, Warden and others
Eddington v. Samuels et al
as 6:2013cv03438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Eddington
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Paul M Laird, Newton E Kendig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Mock et al
as 0:2013cv02520
Plaintiff:
Kirt R. King
Defendant:
Barbara Mock, Denise Wilson, Paul M. Laird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
