Cases 21 - 30 of 293
Hoxsey v. Scott County Board of Supervisors et al
as 4:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lovell Hoxsey
Defendant:
Scott County Board of Supervisors, Tim Lane, S. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Simms et al
as 4:2023cv00184
Plaintiff:
Sherral Tolbert
Defendant:
Murphy Simms, Gregory Lalla, DR Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01535
Plaintiff:
Paulette Bush
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Smith et al v. Bush Management Company LLC
as 0:2023cv01405
Plaintiff:
Joel Smith, Heather Grazzini, Joe Fowler and others
Defendant:
Bush Management Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
Hotchkiss v. Cedar Rapids Community School District, et al
as 1:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Russell Hotchkiss
Defendant:
Cedar Rapids Community School District, Russ Bush, Tawana Grover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Munn v. Singleton et al
as 4:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
Willie Munn
Defendant:
Sheriff James Singleton, Deputy Bush, Jail Administrator James Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Timothy Bush
as 23-1448
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Timothy Paul Bush
Downs v. Bush et al
as 4:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Chad Downs
Defendant:
Sheriff Garry Bush and Ray County, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munn v. Singleton et al
as 4:2022cv04121
Plaintiff:
Willie Munn
Defendant:
Sheriff James Singleton, Jail Administrator James Wise, Guard Kadao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Minnesota Department of Corrections
as 0:2022cv02215
Petitioner:
Adam Bush
Respondent:
Minnesota Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
